Faculty Members’ Lived Experiences with Choosing Open Educational Resources

Troy Martin, Royce Kimmons

Abstract


The cost of textbooks has continued to increase with significant financial effects on students in higher education. Although many faculty express a desire and willingness to adopt and create open textbooks (and OER generally), few actually do. To better understand this gap between attitudes and practices, this phenomenological study builds upon the findings of a survey of faculty members at a large, nationally-ranked, high-research-activity university in the U.S. and uses in-depth interviews to understand faculty members’ lived experiences with OER adoption and creation. Results indicated that though faculty might be motivated to use and create OER to reduce cost and improve pedagogy, they are regularly stymied by quality considerations, copyright fears, technical difficulties, and sustainability concerns. We explore each of these issues in some depth and provide discussion and suggestions on how similar institutions (e.g., high-research-activity) should respond to help support OER adoption and creation.


Keywords


OER; textbooks; faculty; open educational resources; phenomenology

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Allen, N. (2010). A cover to cover solution: How open textbooks are the path to textbook affordability. Student PIRGs. Retrieved from https://studentpirgs.org/2010/09/30/cover-cover-solution-2/

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in US Higher Education, 2014. Babson Survey Research Group.

Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K., (2013). College student and faculty perceptions of the cost and quality of open textbooks. First Monday, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972

Brandle, S., Katz, S., Hays, A., Beths, A., Cooney, C., DiSanto, J., Miles, L., & Morrison, A. (2019). But what do the students think: Results of the CUNY cross-campus zero-textbook cost student survey. Open Praxis, 11(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.932

Brandt, L. W. (1964). How does one select an introductory textbook? PsycCRITIQUES, 9(8), 332-332. https://doi.org/10.1037/007645

Clements, K. I., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2011). User-oriented quality for OER: Understanding teachers' views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x

Ehlers, U. D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1-10.

Hilton, J. III. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

Kendall, J. (1999). Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599902100603

Kimmons, R. (2014). Developing open education literacies with practicing K-12 teachers. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1964

Kimmons, R. (2015). OER quality and adaptation in K-12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341

Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive openness in teacher practice. Teachers College Record, 118(9), 1-34.

Kingkade, T. (2011, October 11). Rising costs force students to skimp on textbooks. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/11/studentadvocates-sound-alarm-on-textbooks_n_924536.html

Martin, M., Belikov, O., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Fischer, L. (2017). Analysis of student and faculty perceptions of textbook costs in higher education. Open Praxis, 9(1), 79-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.432

Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428

Mason, S., & Kimmons, R. (2018). Effects of open textbook adoption on teachers' open practices. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3517

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

Oakes, J., & Saunders, M. (2002). Access to Textbooks, Instructional Materials, Equipment, and Technology: Inadequacy and Inequality in California’s Public Schools. UCLA: Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4ht4z71v

OPAL (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices. OPAL Report 2011. Essen, Germany: Open Education Quality Initiative.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Payne-Sturges, D. C., Tjaden, A., Caldeira, K. M., Vincent, K. B., & Arria, A. M. (2017). Student hunger on campus: Food insecurity among college students and implications for academic institutions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(2), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117719620

Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Middleton-Detzner, C., Walling, J., & Weiss, S. (2011). Open textbook adoption and use: Implications for teachers and learners. Open Learning, 26(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.538563

Seaman, J. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Freeing the textbook: Educational resources in U.S. higher education. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/freeingthetextbook2018.pdf

Senack, E., & Donoghue, R. (2016). Covering the cost: Why we can no longer afford to ignore high textbook prices. Student PIRGs. Retrieved from https://studentpirgs.org/2016/02/03/covering-cost/

Skinner, D., & Howes, B. (2013). The required textbook—Friend or foe? Dealing with the dilemma. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 10(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v10i2.7753

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Wiley, D. (2017). Defining the “open” in open content [Web page]. Open Content. Retrieved from http://www.opencontent.org/definition

Williams, D. (1983). Developing Criteria for Textbook Evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/37.3.251

Woodward, S., Lloyd, A., & Kimmons, R. (2017). Student voice in textbook evaluation: Comparing open and restricted textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3170




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.987

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share