Implementation Factors and Faculty Perceptions of Electronic Textbooks on the iPad

Michelle Dawn Rogers-Estable

Abstract


A federally managed university in the United Arab Emirates implemented a one-to-one iPad program. In an effort to increase access to interactive digital learning resources on the iPads, they next transitioned from paper-based textbooks (pTexts) to electronic textbooks (eTexts) on the iPad for all course delivery formats. The goal of this study was to survey and report on faculty perceptions among three university divisions with the intent of highlighting factors and barriers influencing adoption of iPad-accessed eTexts in the classroom. The objective was to enhance understanding of factors that both contributed to or hindered successful implementation of eTexts. The main findings of this study were that increased training was not perceived as needed by faculty, but instead better support of technical challenges, more efficient workflows in implementation, and usability and interactive features of the eTexts were all the barriers to successful adoption of eTexts in the classroom. Suggestions for project management approaches are given, with reviews on specific factors that influenced successful adoption. The results of this study may be used to improve project management workflows and faculty support in similar implementation projects.


Keywords


electronic textbooks; ebooks; eTexts; faculty support; digital resources

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Baglione, S. L., & Sullivan, K. (2016). Technology and textbooks: The future. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1186466

Baek, E-O. & Monaghan, J. (2013). Journey to textbook affordability; An investigation of students’ use of eTextbooks at multiple campuses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1237

Buzzetto-More, N., Sweat-Guy, R., & Elobaid, M. (2007). Reading in a digital age: eBooks - are students ready for this learning object? Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 239-250. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p239-250Buzzetto.pdf

Cavanaugh, C., Hargis, J., Munns, S., & Kamali, T. (2012). iCelebrate Teaching and Learning: Sharing the iPad Experience. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(2), 1–12. Retrieved from https://jotlt.indiana.edu/article/viewFile/2163/3042

Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37). Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9–37

Daniel, D. B. & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/249008

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Hargis, J., Cavanaugh, C., Kamali, T. & Soto, M. (2014). A Federal Higher Education iPad Mobile Learning Initiative: Triangulation of Data to Determine Early Effectiveness. Innovative Higher Education, 39(1), 45–57, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9259-y

Illowsky, B. S., Hilton, J. III, Whiting, J., & Ackerman, J. D. (2016). Examining student perception of an open statistics book. Open Praxis, 8(3), 265–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.304

Jung, E., Bauer, C., & Heaps, A. (2017). Higher education faculty perceptions of open textbook adoption. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 123–141. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3120/4218

Kissinger, J. S. (2013). The social & mobile learning experiences of students using mobile e-books. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 155–170. Retrieved from http://jaln.sloanconsortium.org/index.php/jaln/article/view/303

Noyes, J. & Garland, K. (2006). Explaining student’s attitudes toward books and computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 351–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.004

Ozdemir, O., & Hendricks, C. (2017). Instructor and student experiences with open textbooks, from the Claifornia open online library for education (Cool4Ed). Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 98–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9138-0

Stone, R. W. & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2013). Students’ expectation, confirmation, and continuance intention to use electronic textbooks. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 984–990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.007

Philip. G. C., & Moon, S-Y. (2013). An investigation of student expectation, perceived performance and satisfaction of e-textbooks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 287–298. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol12/JITEv12IIPp287-298Philip353.pdf

Porter, P. L. (2010). Effectiveness of electronic textbooks with embedded activities on student learning. ProQuest Dissertation Database. Capella University. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/851227180

Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022

Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55, 945-948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.729

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.