Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment

Betty Obura Ogange, John Agak, Kevin Odhiambo Okelo, Peter Kiprotich

Abstract


Assessment is an integral part of the teaching-learning process in both conventional and distance education contexts. Literature suggests that with the increase in the use of Information and Communications Technology in the delivery of learning, a number of institutions are resorting to formative assessment practices that are mediated by technology to not only provide flexible and more efficient means of assessment but also attain improved learning outcomes. This paper investigated student perceptions of the effectiveness of different types of formative assessment used in online learning environments. A 31-item questionnaire was used to gather data on student perceptions. On the level of difficulty, students generally perceived the various types of formative assessment as having no significant differences. Results further indicated that students received more prompt feedback from peer assessment and computer-marked assessment, compared to teacher-marked assessment. The findings of this study will support practitioners in eLearning to use formative assessment and feedback mechanisms more effectively to influence student engagement as well as learning outcomes.


Keywords


formative assessment, feedback, online learning, eLearning, student perceptions

Full Text:

HTML PDF XML

References


Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 45–74). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.

Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2003). Formative and summative assessment: Can they serve learning together. AERA Chicago, 23.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Granada Learning.

Blair, E., & Valdez Noel, K. (2014). Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875984

Cassady, J. & Gridley, E. (2005). The Effects of Online Formative and Summative Assessment on Test Anxiety and Performance. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(1). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ848518.pdf

Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: the challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930220138606

Fluckiger, J., Vigil, Y. T. y., Pasco, R., & Danielson, K. (2010). Formative Feedback: Involving Students as Partners in Assessment to Enhance Learning. College Teaching, 58(4), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.484031

Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004

Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001

Hwang, G.J., & Chang, H.F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002

Hwang, G.J., Chu, H.-C., Yin, P.Y., & Lin, J.Y. (2008). An innovative parallel test sheet composition approach to meet multiple assessment criteria for national tests. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.006

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage.

Kibble, J. (2007). Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00027.2007

Klinkenberg, S. (2017). The Role of Formative Assessment in a Blended Learning Course. In International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (pp. 63–71). Springer, Cham.

Lawton, D., Vye, N., Bransford, J., Sanders, E., Richey, M., French, D., & Stephens, R. (2012). Online learning based on essential concepts and formative assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 244–287.

Lin, J.W., & Lai, Y.C. (2013). Harnessing collaborative annotations on online formative assessments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 263–274. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/16_1/23.pdf

Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (2nd ed. Vol. 28). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Martin, F., & Ndoye, A. (2016). Using learning analytics to assess student learning in online courses. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(3), 7. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol13/iss3/7/

McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615

McLaughlin, T., & Yan, Z. (2017). Diverse delivery methods and strong psychological benefits: A review of online formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 562–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12200

McTighe, J., & O’Connor, K. (2009). Seven practices for effective learning. Kaleidoscope: Contemporary and Classic Readings in Education, 174.

Michael, W., & Mayende, G. (2014). Technology Mediated Learning and the Development of Higher Order Cognitive Skills: Using Activity Theory to Analyze the Actors in the Instructional Environment at Makerere University in Uganda. Paper presented at the The Third International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education (ICEEE2014).

Muijs, D. (2010). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Njoroge, R., & Kibaru, F. (2012). Implementing Quality E-learning: Which Way for Higher Education Institutions in Kenya? Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications.

Nyerere, J. A., Gravenir, F. Q., & Mse, G. S. (2012). Delivery of open, distance, and e-learning in Kenya. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 185–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1120

Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003

Russell, J., Elton, L., Swinglehurst, D., & Greenhalgh, T. (2006). Using the online environment in assessment for learning: A case-study of a web-based course in primary care. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679209

Shepherd, C. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Examining preservice teacher inquiry through video-based, formative assessment e-portfolios. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 31–37. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10402454.2008.10784606

Sims, R., Dobbs, G., & Hand, T. (2002). Enhancing Quality in Online Learning: Scaffolding Planning and Design Through Proactive Evaluation. Distance Education, 23(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791022000009169

Thelwall, M. (2000). Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool. Computers & Education, 34(1), 37–49.

Topping, K. J. (2010). Peers as a source of formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 61–74). New York: Routledge.

Tshibalo, A. (2007). The potential impact of computer-aided assessment technology in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education: NADEOSA 2006: Special Edition 6, 21, 684–693.

Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485

Wang, K. H., Wang, T., Wang, W.-L., & Huang, S. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x

Wang, T.-H. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’e-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.001

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Zakrzewski, S., & Bull, J. (1998). The mass implementation and evaluation of computer-based assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 141–152.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.705

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.