Role of Faculty Development Forums in Virtual Teaching Environment: A Case Study of Marketing Research & Case Group

Rizwan Saleem Sandhu, Sajid Hussain


The online learning has broadened the teaching spectrum from Face-to-Face to virtual environment, and this move has brought traditional teacher-centered instruction to learner-centered instruction. This paradigm shift appears to place demands on faculty to modify faculty’s instruction roles that are different from those encountered in Face-to-Face teaching. This study explores the role of faculty development forum in improving the virtual teaching skills of academic staff members in an online university. The study has used single holistic case study approach, and the data from nine respondents have been collected through an interview schedule divided into four sections of 1) Basic Information, 2) Presentation Skills, 3) Subject Knowledge and 4) Research Orientation as per the objectives of the study. It can be theorized from the findings of the study that in virtual environments where faculty members lack the learning opportunities and exposure available in the conventional environments such forums prove to be very effective in capacity building of the faculty.


Capacity Building; Virtual Learning; Teaching Skills; Faculty Development

Full Text:



Åkerlind, G. S. (2011). Separating the ‘teaching’ from the ‘academic’: Possible unintended consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 183–195.

Armellini, A., & Jones, S. (2008). Carpe diem: Seizing each day to foster change in e-learning design. Reflecting Education, 4, 17–29. Retrieved from

Barajas, M., & Gannaway, G. J. (2007). Implementing e-learning in the traditional higher education institutions. Higher Education in Europe, 32(2), 111–119.

Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 348–379.

Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Elliott, M., Rhoades, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional Development: Designing Initiatives to Meet the Needs of Online Faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1).

García, E., Arias, M. B., Murri, N. J. H., & Serna, C. (2010). Developing responsive teachers: A challenge for a demographic reality. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 132–142.

Gregory, J. & Salmon, G. (2013). Professional development for online university teaching. Distance Education, 34(3), 256–270.

Hyde, K. F. (2000). Recognizing deductive process in qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 82–89.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.

Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.

Meyer, K. A. (2013). An analysis of the research on faculty development for online teaching and identification of new directions. Online Learning Journal, 17(4).

McQuiggan, C. A. (2012). Faculty development for online teaching as a catalyst for change. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16, 27–61. Retrieved from

Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Smet, M., van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers & Education, 50(1), 207–223.

Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research – Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.



  • There are currently no refbacks.