Rhizo14: A Rhizomatic Learning cMOOC in Sunlight and in Shade

Jenny Mackness, Frances Bell


The authors present findings from the first stage of research into a ‘home-grown’ connectivist MOOC, Rhizomatic Learning: The Community is the Curriculum (Rhizo14). We compare the surface view of the MOOC that has been presented in a range of open blog posts and articles with the view from beneath the surface that we have found in data we have collected (some anonymously). Our analysis reveals a positive, even transformative, experience for many participants on the one hand, but some more negative experiences and outcomes for other participants. These findings highlight the need for further research on the ethical implications of pedagogical experimentation, interrelated processes of community and curriculum formation, the role of the MOOC convener, and learner experiences within MOOC communities. In this paper we report on the alternative experiences of Rhizo14 participants and identify issues that we will explore in deeper analysis in forthcoming publications.



Massive open online course (MOOC), rhizomatic learning, ethics, learner experience, teaching, Rhizo14

Full Text:



Bali, M. & Honeychurch, S. (2014). Key Pedagogic Thinkers – Dave Cormier. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.beds.ac.uk/jpd/volume-4-issue-3/key-pedagogic-thinkers-maha-bali

Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn. Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Open University Press.

Bates, T. (2014a, October 1). The role of communities of practice in a digital age. Retrieved from http://www.tonybates.ca/2014/10/01/the-role-of-communities-of-practice-in-a-digital-age/

Bates, T. (2014b, October 13). Comparing xMOOCs and cMOOCs. Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.tonybates.ca/2014/10/13/comparing-xmoocs-and-cmoocs-philosophy-and-practice/

Bayne, S. & Ross, J. (2014). The pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course: the UK view. York: The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/HEA_Edinburgh_MOOC_WEB_240314_1.pdf

Bell, F. (2010). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 12(3), 98-118. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/902/1664

Bell, F. (2014a). Rhizo14 Research. Retrieved from https://francesbell.wordpress.com/research/rhizo14-research/

Bell, F. (2014b). Getting another perspective. Retrieved from https://francesbell.wordpress.com/2014/09/01/getting-another-perspective/

Biesta, G. (2013). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 35-49. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/pandpr/article/download/19860/15386

Brinton, C. G., Chiang, M., Jain, S., Lam, H., Liu, Z. & Wong, F. M. F. (2013). Learning about social learning in MOOCs: From statistical analysis to generative model. Arxiv e-prints. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2159

Cormier, D. (2008, June 3). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/06/03/rhizomatic-education-community-as-curriculum/

Cormier, D. (2013, December 29). Unravelling -> a model for an open course? Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2013/12/29/unravelling-a-model-for-an-open

Cormier, D (2014a, January 28). Rhizo14 feedback results and explanation. Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2014/01/28/rhizo14-feedback-results-and-explanation/

Cormier, D. (2014b). Rhizo14 – The MOOC that community built. The International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3). Retrieved from http://papers.efquel.org/index.php/innoqual/article/view/162/48

Cormier, D. (2014c, January 12). Your unguided tour of Rhizo14. Retrieved from http://davecormier.com/edblog/2014/01/12/your-unguided-tour-of-rhizo14/

Cormier, D. & Siemens, G. (2010). The Open Course: Through the Open Door--Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement. Educause Review, 45(4), 30-39. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ951238

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. University of Minnesota Press.

Downes, S. (2007, November 24). Groups vs. Networks: The Class Struggle Continues. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/42521

Downes, S. (2014, May 26). Digital Research Methodologies Redux. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/presentation/341

Dwyer, S. C. & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54-63. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/2981

Eynon, R., Hjorth, I., Yasseri, T. & Gillani, N. (2014). How can social interaction support learning in a MOOC? Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved from http://ipp.oii.ox.ac.uk/2014/programme-2014/track-a-harnessing-the-crowd/design-ii/rebecca-eynon-isis-hjorth-taha-yasseri

Fenwick, T. & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-Network Theory in Education (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.

Ferguson, R. & Whitelock, D. (2014). Taking on different roles : how educators position themselves in MOOCs. In Rensing, C.; de Freitas, S.; Ley, T. & Munoz-Merino, P. J. (eds). Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing (In press).

Fullick, M. (2014). The times, they are (always) a-changin’. Retrieved November 9, 2014, from http://www.universityaffairs.ca/speculative-diction/the-times-they-are-always-a-changin/

Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

Gillani, N., Yasseri, T., Eynon, R. & Hjorth, I. (2014). Structural limitations of learning in a crowd: communication vulnerability and information diffusion in MOOCs. Scientific Reports, 4, 6447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep06447

Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S. & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is Research on Massive Open Online Courses Headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1954

Haggard, S. (2013). The Maturing of the MOOC. BIS Research Paper Number 130. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240193/13-1173-maturing-of-the-mooc.pdf

Haythornthwaite, C. & Kazmer, M. M. (2001). Bringing the Internet Home: Adult Distance Learners and Their Internet, Home and Work Worlds. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (p. 431-463). Blackwell Publishing.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/publications/2013-horizon-report-higher-ed

Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651

Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704

Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/882

Kop, R., Fournier, H. & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 12(7), 74-93. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1041/2025

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V. & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 49-74. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=hcii

Lau, T. (2014). Engagement or alienation? Reflections on MOOC design, facilitator role, and context. Special Issue on MOOCs. Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies, 2(3), 236-240. Retrieved from http://joglep.com/files/3314/0622/3848/8._Engagement_or_alienation.pdf

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A. & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1455

Mackness, J. (2014a, June 23). Making sense of the rhizome metaphor for teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://jennymackness.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/making-sense-of-the-rhizome-metaphor-for-teaching-and-learning

Mackness, J. (2014b, June 11). Next steps in rhizomatic learning research. Retrieved from http://jennymackness.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/next-steps-in-rhizomatic-learning-research-rhizo14/

Mackness, J. (2014c, February 16). Rhizomatic Learning – a pedagogy of risk - Retrieved from http://jennymackness.wordpress.com/2014/02/16/rhizomatic-learning-a-pedagogy-of-risk/

Mackness, J. (2014d). Rhizo14 Research. Retrieved from https://jennymackness.wordpress.com/rhizo14-research/

Mackness, J., Mak, S. F. J. & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Networked Learning Conference, Aarlborg (pp. 266-274). Retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/Mackness.html

Mackness, J., Waite, M., Roberts, G. & Lovegrove, E. (2013). Learning in a small, task–oriented, connectivist MOOC: Pedagogical issues and implications for higher education. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 14(4). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1548/2636

Markham, A. & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0) (pp. 1-19). Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Marshall, S. (2014). Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 250-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917706

Masters, K. (2009). A Brief Guide To Understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education, 1(2). Retrieved from http://ispub.com/IJME/1/2/10995

McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G. & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf

Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A. & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.htm

Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley , CA: University of California Press.

Prinsloo, P. & Slade, S. (2014). Educational triage in open distance learning: Walking a moral tightrope. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 20(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1881

Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=current&article&article=516

Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J. & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity : The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57–69. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/ross_0314.pdf

Siemens, G. (2004, December 12). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm

Siemens, G. (2012, July 25). MOOCs are really a platform. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heineman.

Watters, A. (2012, December 18). Top Ed-Tech Trends of 2012: MOOCs. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/hack-higher-education/top-ed-tech-trends-2012-moocs

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., Trayner, B. & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and

assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. Centrum. Ruud de Moor Centrum. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/documents/Wenger_Trayner_DeLaat_Value_creation.pdf

Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D. & Penstein Rose, C. (2013). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education (pp. 1-8) Retrieved from http://lytics.stanford.edu/datadriveneducation/papers/yangetal.pdf

Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M. & Jakobs, H. (2014). MOOCs. A Review of the State-of-the-Art. In CSEDU2014-6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 9-20). Retrieved from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/download/file/fid/35609

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.173


  • There are currently no refbacks.