Social Interaction in Self-paced Distance Education

Terry Anderson, Lorne Upton, Jon Dron, Judi Malone, Bruno Poelhuber

Abstract


In this paper we present a case study of a self-paced university course that was originally designed to support independent, self-paced study at distance. We developed a social media intervention, in design-based research terms, that allows these independent students to contribute archived content to enhance the course, to engage in discussions with other students and to share as little or as much personal information with each other as they wished. We describe the learning design for the intervention and present survey data of student and tutor perception of value and content analysis of the archived contributions. The results indicate that the intervention was positively received by tutors and by the majority (but not all) students and that the archive created by the students’ contributions was adding value to the course. We conclude that the intervention was a modest, yet manageable example of a learning enhancement to a traditional cognitive-behavioral, course that has positive impact and potential with little negative impact on workload.


Keywords


Social Networks; blogs; self-paced study; online education; web 2.0; enhanced learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research on Distance and Open Learning, 12(3), 80-97. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1826.

Anderson, T. & Kuskis, A. (2007). Modes of Interaction in Distance Education. In M. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Archer, W. & Garrison, R. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in computer conferencing transcripts. Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(2). Retrieved January 14, 2004 from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_anderson.asp.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Buchem, I., Attwell, G. & Torres, R. (2011). Understanding personal learning environments: Literature review and synthesis through the activity theory lens. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the The PLE Conference, Southampton, 10th-12th July 2011. Retrieved from http://journal.webscience.org/658

Buchem, I., Tur Ferrer, G. & Holterhof, T. (2014). Learner control in Personal Learning Environments: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 14. Retrieved from http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/uploads/1/3/6/8/136889/ib1.pdf

Bullen, M., Morgan, T. & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation is Not the Issue. La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, North America, 37, apr. 2011. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/550

Burke, J. G., O’Campo, P., Peak, G. L., Gielen, A. C., McDonnell, K. A. & Trochim, W. M. (2005). An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qualitative health research, 15(10), 1392-1410.

Dron, J. & Anderson, T. (2014a). Agoraphobia and the modern learner. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/article/2014-03/html

Dron, J. & Anderson, T. (2014b). Teaching crowds: Learning and social media. Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.

Dye, J. F., Schatz, I. M., Rosenberg, B. A. & Coleman, S. T. (2000). Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report, 4(1/2), 1-9.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 5-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

Garrison, D. R. & Shale, D. (1990). A new framework and perspective In D. R. Garrison & D. Shale (Eds.), Education at a distance: from issues to practice (pp. 123-133). Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.

Harper, G. & Kember, D. (1986). Approaches to study of distance education students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 212-222.

Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Paulsen, M. (2008). Cooperative Online Education. Seminar.net, 4(2). Retrieved from Seminar.net

Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S. & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734-746.

Richardson, J. (2013). Approaches to studying across the adult life span: Evidence from distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 74-80.

Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Sheldon, K., M. & Krieger, L., S. (2007). Understanding the negative effects of legal education on law students: A longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 883-897. Retrieved from http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=40A4A0E8EFCFDCDFC11D

Siemens, G. (2005). A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 2(1), 3-10. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M. & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.1.164

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.