Pedagogical quality enrichment in OER based courseware: Guiding principles

Pradeep Kumar Misra

Abstract


This is a critical phase for Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: on one side the number of OER is increasing rapidly, and on other side debates about quality of OER-based courseware are heating up. These debates emanate from the fact that OER-based courseware are supposed to help users to follow a logical learning path and get an engaging, interactive, and enjoyable learning experience. There are two aspects of quality assurance in OER-based courseware: content and pedagogy. The content aspect primarily rests with subject experts, and pedagogical quality of courseware mainly lies in the hands of developers. Present trends reveal that mainly enthusiasts, working with some support from the institution management are designing and developing OER-based courseware. There seems a possibility that these enthusiasts are developing courseware without undergoing any specific courseware development training, and in the absence of proper knowledge and training about pedagogy, one can not be sure that the produced courseware will be of superior quality. In this backdrop, present paper discusses and details about a number of guiding principles for enrichment of pedagogical quality in OER-based courseware.


Keywords


Open Educational Resources; OER-based courseware; Pedagogical quality enrichment; Principles for OER development; Quality assurance

References


Achieve. (2012). Helping educators determine the quality of open education resources. Retrieved from http://www.achieve.org/helping-educators-determine-quality-open-education-resources.

Allen, M. W. (2003). Michael Allen’s guide to e-Learning. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Anderson, J. & McCormick, R. ( 2005). Ten pedagogic principles of E-learning. Observatory for New Technologies and Education. Retrieved from http://www.icwe.net/oeb_special/OEB_Newsportal/ wp-content/uploads/2011/09/10-Principles-for-Successful-E-learning.pdf

Atkins, D., Seely, B. J. & Hammond, A. (2007). A review of the Open Educational Resources movement: Achievements, challenges and new opportunities. Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved from http://oerderves.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/a-reviewof-the-open-educational-resources-oer-movement_final.pdf

Boettcher, J. V. (2007). Ten core principles for designing effective learning environments: Insights from brain research and pedagogical theory. Retrieved from http://www.unb.ca/fredericton/cetl/_resources/pdf/10-principles-designing-learningenvironments-brainresearch.pdf

Brandon, B. (Ed.) (2005). 834 tips for successful online instruction. Santa Rosa, CA: The eLearning Guild. Retrieved from http://www.elearningguild.com

Clark, R. (2002). Six principles of effective e-Learning: What works and why. Learning Solutions e-Magazine, September 10, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.elearningguild.com/pdf/2/091002DESH.pdf

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

Clements, K.I. & Pawlowski, J.M. (2012). User-oriented quality for OER: understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28 (1), 4–14. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x

D’Antoni, S. & Savage, C. (Eds.). (2009). Open educational resources conversations in cyberspace. Paris: UNESCO.

Downes S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–44. Retrieved from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf

Geser, G. (2012). Open educational practices and resources OLCOS roadmap 2012. Austria: OLCOS Project. Retrieved from http://olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf

Hudson, F. & Moyle, K. (2004). Open source software suitable for use in Australian and New Zealand schools. Adelaide: DECS SA. Retrieved from http://educationau.edu.au/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/papers/open_source_aust_nz.pdf

Hylén, J. (2009). Mapping producers and users. In S. D’Antoni & C. Savage (Eds.), Open educational resources conversations in cyberspace (pp.127–134). Paris: UNESCO.

Jing, Y. (2005). Courseware. Retrieved from http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/ courseware

Johnstone, S. M. (2005). Open Educational Resources serve the world. EDUCAUSE Quarterly (EQ), 28 (3). Retrieved from http://educause.edu/node/157364

Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107–119. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4

Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

McGill, L. (2011). Quality considerations. Retrieved from https://openeducationalresources.pbworks.com/w/page/24838164/Quality%20considerations

Melton, R. (2002). Planning and developing open and distance learning: A quality assurance approach. London: Routledge Falmer.

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

Middle East Technical University. (2013). CEIT 317—Instructional Technology and Material Development. Retrieved from http://ocw.metu.edu.tr/mod/page/view.php?id=48

OECD. (2007). Giving knowledge for free. The emergence of open educational resources. Paris: OECD.

Open Course Ware Consortium. (2012). What is Open Course Ware? Retrieved from http://ocwconsortium.org/en/aboutus/whatisocw

Pawlowski, J.M. (2007). The quality adaptation model: adaptation and adoption of the quality standard ISO/IEC 19796-1 for learning, education, and training. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 3–16. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/abstract.php?art_id=746

Phillips, J.A., Ahmed, A. & Kaur, K. (2005). Instructional design principles in the development of an E-Learning graduate course. International Conference on e-Learning, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://eprints.oum.edu.my/447/1/instructional_john.pdf

Santally, M. I. (2011). OERs in Context—Case Study of Innovation and Sustainability of Educational Practices at the University of Mauritius. European Journal of Online and Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?article=419

Tzikopoulos, A., Manouselis, N. & Vuorikari, R. (2007). An overview of Learning Object Repositories. In P. Northrup (Ed.), Learning Objects for Instruction, Design and Evaluation (pp. 29–55). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. Retrieved from http://infolab-dev.aua.gr/files/publications/en/1185188742.pdf

UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf

UNESCO. (2012). 2012 Paris OER declaration. Retrieved from http://unesco.org/new/.../CI/.../Paris%20OER%20Declaration_01.pdf

UNESCO, IIEP & Albright, P. (2005). Internet discussion forum: Open Educational Resources—Open content for higher education (24 October—2 December 2005), Final forum report. Retrieved from http://ifap.ru/library/book064.pdf

Valkenburg, W.V. (2011). Open courseware and standards. Retrieved from http://www.imsglobal.org/meetings/Utrecht2011/Opencourseware%20Consortium.pdf

White, G. (2008). ICT trends in education. Digital Learning Research. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/digital_learning/2


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.