Comparing communities of inquiry of Portuguese higher education students: one for all or one for each?

Jose António Moreira, António Gomes Ferreira, Ana Cristina Almeida

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to report evidence obtained in a survey based on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 1991; 2000) carried out in different groups. The study comprised 510 higher education students enrolled in blended online courses offered through Moodle platform during one semester. It considered students from different private and public Portuguese polytechnic schools and universities. Moreira & Almeida (2011) have suggested that CoI framework is a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of its dimensions within the Portuguese population. Although similarities in aspects of social presence were discovered among polytechnic and universities students, the two groups showed some differences. In particular, it was observed that the polytechnic students appear to be a more robust community when compared to university students.


Keywords


Blended Learning; Community of Inquiry; Learning Community; Online Learning; Polytechnic; University

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ally, M. (2004). Designing Effective Learning Objects. In R. McGreal (Ed.), Online Education Using Learning Objects (pp. 87–97). London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education,

(3–4), 133-136. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. London: Routledge Falmer. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: a conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260137910100403

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for

integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41(4), 397–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.07.001

Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen., T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71–79.

Järvelä, S., Volet, S. & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433539

Klenner-Moore, J. (2002). Dialogic Enquiry in an Online Community. In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 1714–1717. Retrieved from http://www.

editlib.org/p/9340.

Monteiro, A. (2011) O currículo e a prática pedagógica com recurso ao b-learning no ensino superior. Ph.D. Thesis, Porto: Porto University.

Moore, W. (1983). Developing and Evaluating Educational Research. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

Moreira, J.A., & Monteiro, A. (2010). O trabalho pedagógico em cenários presenciais e virtuais no ensino superior. Educação, Formação e Tecnologia, 3(2), 82–94. Retrieved from http://eft.educom.pt

Moreira, J. A., & Almeida, A. C. (2011). How reliable and consistent is our learning community of inquiry? Psychometric qualities of the community of inquiry survey instrument applied to a sample of higher education Portuguese students. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona. 4261–4267.

Moreira, J. A. (2012). Novos cenários e modelos de aprendizagem construtivistas em plataformas digitais. In A. Monteiro, J. A. Moreira & A. C. Almeida (Orgs.), Educação Online: Pedagogia e Aprendizagem em Plataformas Digitais (pp. 29–46), Santo Tirso: De Facto Editores.

Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance. Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., et al. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor, 2(24), 1–12 Retrieved from http://www.ementor.edu.pl/e_index.php?numer=24&all=1

Thompson, T.L., & Macdonald, C.J. (2005) Community building, emergent design and expecting the unexpected: Creating a quality eLearning experience. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 233-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.004

Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D.R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1–12. http://dx.doi.

org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.11.001

White, B. & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16, 3–118.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.2.50

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.