Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions

Olga Maria Belikov, Robert Bodily

Abstract


In this paper, 218 U.S faculty responses regarding Open Educational Resources (OER) were qualitatively analyzed. Ten categories emerged in the coding process. The top three categories that indicated barriers to the adoption of OER were need more information (faculty wanted more information before they would be willing to adopt OER), lack of discoverability (faculty wanted to be able to easily find repositories of OER), and confusing OER with digital resources (faculty were unaware of the difference between digital resources and OER). The top incentives identified in this analysis to overcome these barriers include student cost benefits (saving students money), student pedagogical benefits (faculty being able to make changes to OER to improve course content and instruction), and institutional support for the adoption of OER (whether in the form of course load reduction, curricular research assistance, or library support for finding and adopting OER). Future research is needed to better understand how to address and overcome these barriers to OER adoption.


Keywords


Open Educational Resources; OER; Perceptions; Traditional resources; Motivations; Barriers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abeywardena, I. S., Gajaraj, D., & Chan C. S. (2012). Searching and locating OER: Barriers to the wider adoption of OER for teaching in Asia. Regional Symposium on Open Educational Resources: An Asian Perspective on Policies and Practice. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236170461

Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthecurriculum2014.pdf

Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2012). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. Ithaka S+R. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/sr-ithaka-interactive-learning-online-at-publicuniversities.pdf

Bliss T., Robinson, T. J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2013-04

Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1). http://dx-doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972

Goldberg, C. (2001, April 4). Auditing classes at M.I.T., on the web and free. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/ocwcom/MITOCW/Media/NYTimes_040301_MITOCW.pdf

Guttenplan, D. D. (2010, November 1). For exposure, universities put courses on the web. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/world/europe/01iht-educLede01.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Hilton J., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4), 37–50. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1523/2652

Hilton, J., Robinson T. J., Wiley, D. A., & Ackerman, J. (2014). Cost-savings achieved in two semesters through the adoption of open educational resources. International Review of Research on Distance and Open Learning, 15(2), 67–84. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1700/2833

Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

Linshield, B., & Adhikari, K. (2013). Online and campus college students like using an open educational resource instead of a traditional textbook. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(1), 1–7. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no1/lindshield_0313.htm

Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1). http://doi.org/10.5334/2008-14

Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating perceived barriers to the use of open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. International Review of Distance and Open Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1803/284

Pawlyshyn, N., Braddlee, D., Casper, L., & Miller, H. (2013). Adopting OER: A case study of crossinstitutional collaboration and innovation. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/11/adopting-oer-a-case-study-of-crossinstitutional-collaboration-andinnovation

Robinson, T. J., Fischer, L., Wiley, D. A., & Hilton, J. (2014). The impact of open textbooks on secondary science learning outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 341–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14550275

Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14395

Venkaiah, V., & Ambedkar, B. R. (2012). Open educational resources in India—A study of attitudes and perceptions of distance teachers. WikiEducator. Retrieved from https://wikieducator.org/images/d/d7/PID_386.pdf

Wiley, D., Hilton, J., Ellington, S., & Hall, T. (2012). A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 261–276. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1153/2256




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.