A Framework for the Ethics of Open Education

Robert Farrow

Abstract


What difference does openness make to the ethics of teaching and research? This paper approaches this question both from the perspective of research into the use of open educational resources (OER) in teaching and learning. An outline of the nature and importance of ethics in education research is provided before the basic principles of research ethics are examined through a discussion of traditional guidance provided by three UK research governance bodies: the Economics and Social Research Council; the British Education Research Association; and the British Psychological Society. The importance and foundation of institutional approval for research activities is analysed with several examples of the differences made by openness. It is argued that openness by its nature provokes particular issues for education researchers. A framework for understanding openness in education is then proposed based on basic meta-ethical positions (deontological; consequentialist; virtue). Used as a tool, the framework attempts to retain relevance in a variety of scenarios without requiring a dogmatic vision of openness (e.g. an insistence on open licensing). This framework is then evaluated in the context of the OER Research Hub project, which developed guidance for others in the form of an 'ethics manual' and online learning provided through the OER Research Hub’s 'Open Research' course hosted on P2PU’s School of Open. Use of the framework is intended to contribute to a better understanding of professional ethics for open practitioners.


Keywords


open education, ethics, OER, data, pedagogy, MOOC, privacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


AOIR (2012). Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Arthur, C. (2009, April 3). MPs' expenses, by amount, on a map: does distance matter? The Guardian. Retrieved from

http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/apr/03/mps-expenses-houseofcommons

Belmont Report (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html

BERA (2014). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved from http://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/resources-for-researchers

BPS (2010). Code of Human Research Ethics. The British Psychological Society. Retrieved from http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/code_of_human_research_ethics.pdf

Burtman, B. (2009, December 28). The Revolution Will Be Mapped. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from http://www.psmag.com/books-and-culture/the-revolution-will-be-mapped-7130

Cabinet Office (1997). Your Right to Know: the Government's Proposals for a Freedom of Information Act (Command Paper). London: The Stationery Office. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/your-right-to-know-the-governments-proposals-for-a-freedom-of-information-act.

Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open Content and Open Educational Resources: Enabling universal education. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/469/1001

CDC (2013). U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee. Center for Disease Control. And Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/

Data Protection Act (1998). London: The Stationery Office. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents

de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Perryman, L.-A., Pitt, R. & Weller, M. (2014). OER Evidence Report 2013-2014. OER Research Hub. Retrieved from http://oerhub.net/reports.

de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Perryman, L.-A., Pitt, R. & Weller, M. (2015). OER Data Report 2013-2015. OER Research Hub. Retrieved from http://oerhub.net/reports

Emmanuel, E. J. (2013). Online Education: MOOCs Taken by Educated Few. Nature 503, 342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/503342a

ESRC (2015). ESRC Framework for Research Ethics. Economics and Social Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/files/funding/guidance-for-applicants/esrc-framework-for-research-ethics-2015/

Farrow, R. (2013). OER Research Hub Ethics Manual. Retrieved from http://oerhub.net/reports

Farrow, R., Pitt, R., de los Arcos, B., Perryman, L.-A., Weller, M. & McAndrew, P. (2015). Impact of OER use on teaching and learning: Data from OER Research Hub (2013–2014). British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 972-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12310

Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press.

Freedom of Information Act (2000). London: The Stationery Office. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/contents

Hearnshaw, H. (2004). Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. British Medical Journal 328,140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.140

Hewlett Foundation (undated). Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/programs/education/open-educational-resources

HHS (2005) [1947]. The Nuremberg Code. U.S. Department of Human and Health Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html

HHS (2009). Code of Federal Regulations: Protection of Human Subjects. U.S. Department of Human and Health Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html

Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade: a study of homosexual encounters in public places. London: Duckworth.

Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–160. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651

Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(24). Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full

Laurillard, D. (2014, June 26). What is the Problem for Which MOOCs are the Solution? ALT Online Newsletter. Retrieved from https://newsletter.alt.ac.uk/ 2014/06/what-is-the-problem-for-which-moocs-are-the-solution/

Longo, D. L. & Drazen, J. M. (2016). Data Sharing. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 276-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1516564

National Institutes of Health (2014). Protecting Human Research Participants. Retrieved from http://phrp.nihtraining.com/.

OER Impact Map (2014). OER Impact Map. Retrieved from http://oermap.org

OER Research Hub (2015). Open Educational Resources Research Hub. Retrieved from http://oerhub.net

Perryman, L.-A. (2013, August 16). Can OER Break Down Barriers to Participation in Education? OER Research Hub. Retrieved from http://oerresearchhub.org/2013/08/16/can-oer-break-down-barriers-to-participation-in-education/

Pitt, R., Farrow, R., de los Arcos, B., & Weller, M. (2014). Open Research. Peer 2 Peer University (P2Pu). Retrieved from https://courses.p2pu.org/he/courses/2377/open-research-2014/

Rolfe, V. (2015) A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of Massive Online Open Courses. The European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 18(1), 53-72. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/26803

Shore, N. (2006). Re-conceptualizing the Belmont Report: A community-based participatory research perspective. Journal of Community Practice, 14(4), 5–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n04_02

UNESCO (2012). What is the Paris OER Declaration? Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-to-knowledge/open-educational-resources/what-is-the-paris-oer-declaration/

United Nations (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

United Nations (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx.

United States Adjutant General’s Department (1947). Trials of War Criminals Before Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 (October, 1946-April, 1949). The Medical Case. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Verma, I. M. (2014). Editorial Expression of Concern: Experimental evidence of massivescale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(29), 10779.

Weller, M. (2013). The Art Of Guerrilla Research. The Ed Techie. Retrieved from http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2013/10/the-art-of-guerrilla-research.html.

Weller, M. (2014). Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bam

Wiley, D. (2015). The Deeper Ethics of Education and Open: Generosity, Care, and Relationships. Iterating Toward Openness. Retrieved from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3732.

World Medical Association (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 310(20), 2191-2194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.2.291

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.