A Case Study of Scholars’ Open and Sharing Practices

George Veletsianos

Abstract


Although the open scholarship movement has successfully captured the attention and interest of higher education stakeholders, researchers currently lack an understanding of the degree to which open scholarship is enacted in institutions that lack institutional support for openness. I help fill this gap in the literature by presenting a descriptive case study that illustrates the variety of open and sharing practices enacted by faculty members at a North American university. Open and sharing practices enacted at this institution revolve around publishing manuscripts in open ways, participating on social media, creating and using open educational resources, and engaging with open teaching. This examination finds that certain open practices are favored over others. Results also show that even though faculty members often share scholarly materials online for free, they frequently do so without associated open licenses (i.e. without engaging in open practices). These findings suggest that individual motivators may significantly affect the practice of openness, but that environmental factors (e.g., institutional contexts) and technological elements (e.g., YouTube’s default settings) may also shape open practices in unanticipated ways.


Keywords


Openness; Open Practices; Open Scholarship; Digital Participation; Case Study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthecurriculum2014.pdf

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813

Armellini, A., & Nie, M. (2013). Open educational practices for curriculum enhancement. Open Learning: Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 28(1), 7-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.796286

Bossu, C., Bull, D., & Brown, M. (2012). Opening up Down Under: The role of open educational resources in promoting social inclusion in Australia. Distance Education, 33(2), 151-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692050

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Brown, J., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032

de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Perryman, L.-A., Pitt, R. & Weller, M. (2014). OER Evidence Report 2013-2014. OER Research Hub. Retrieved from http://oerresearchhub.org/about-2/reports

Deimann, M., & Farrow, R. (2013). Rethinking OER and their use: Open education as Bildung. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 14(3), 344-360. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1370/2542

Dron, J. (2006). Any color you like, as long as it’s Blackboard. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2006 (1), 2772-2779.

Dutton, W. (2013) The social shaping of digital research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 177-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.774171

Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1-10. Retrieved from http://journals.akoaotearoa.ac.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/64

Eich, E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25(1), 3-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613512465

Esposito, A. (2013). Neither digital or open. Just researchers. Views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university. First Monday, 18(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3881

Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.

Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636

Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47.

Hayden, E. C. (2011, August 9). Open research casts doubt on arsenic life. Nature News. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.469

Hilton III, J., Lutz, N., & Wiley, D. (2012). Examining the reuse of open textbooks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 45-58. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1137/2130

Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10-15.

Kesan, J. P., & Shah, R. C. (2006). Setting software defaults: Perspectives from law, computer science and behavioral economics. Notre Dame Law Review, 82(2), 583-634.

Knox, J. (2013). The limitations of access alone: moving towards open processes in education technology. Open Praxis, 5(1), 21-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.36

Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. V. (2008). Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Memorandum Of Understanding (2014). Memorandum of Understanding on Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?mediaId=f3d342c4-ab61-44a4-9f96-71ceb7810a5d&PN=Shared

Mulder, F. (2013). The logic of national policies and strategies for open educational resources. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 14(2), 96-105. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1536/2505

Murphy, A. (2013). Open educational practices in higher education: institutional adoption and challenges. Distance Education, 34(2), 201-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.793641

Nature Publishing Group. (2013). Reporting Checklist For Life Sciences Articles. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/checklist.pdf

NSERC (2014). Draft Tri-Agency Open Access Policy. Retrieved on May 5, 2014 from http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/policies-politiques/Tri-OA-Policy-Politique-LA-Trois_eng.asp

Nikoi, S., & Armellini, A. (2012). The OER mix in higher education: purpose, process, product, and policy. Distance Education, 33(2), 165-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.697439

Oliver, M. (2013). Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 31-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01283.x

Open e-Learning Content Observatory Services (OLCOS) (2012). Open Educational Practices and Resources. Project Report. Retrieved from http://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf

Open Educational Quality Initiative. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices. OPAL Report 2011. Retrieved from http://www.oerup.eu/fileadmin/_oerup/dokumente/Beyond_OER._Shifting_Focus_to_Open_Educational_Practices__OPAL_Report__2011.pdf

Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23

Robinson, T. J., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. (2014). The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary Science Learning Outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 341-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14550275

SB 1052 (2012). Steinberg. Public postsecondary education: California Open Education Resources Council. Retrieved from http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_1051-1100/sb_1052_bill_20120905_enrolled.html

SB 1053 (2012). Steinberg. Public postsecondary education: California Digital Open Source Library. Retrieved from http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_1051-1100/sb_1053_bill_20120905_enrolled.html

Scheliga, K., & Friesike, S. (2014). Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma? First Monday, 19(9), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381

Schreurs, B., Beemt, A. Van Den, Prinsen, F., Witthaus, G., Conole, G., & De Laat, M. (2014). An investigation into social learning activities by practitioners in open educational practices. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1905

Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x

Tuomi, I. (2013). Open Educational Resources and the Transformation of Education. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 58-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12019

UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf

Veletsianos, G. (in press). Defining Characteristics of Emerging Technologies and Emerging Practices. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Online learning: Emerging Technologies and Emerging Practices (pp. XX-XX). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012a). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 166-189. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1313/2304

Veletsianos, G. & Kimmons, R. (2012b). Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent Techno-Cultural Pressures Toward Open and Digital Scholarship in Online Networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), 766-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001

Vincent-Lamarre, P., Boivin, J., Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V., & Harnad, S. (2014). Estimating Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: I. The MELIBEA Score. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.2926. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.2926

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wiley, D. (2009, Nov. 16). Defining “open.” [Web log]. Retrieved from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1123

Wiley, D. (n.d). Defining the “Open” in Open Content. Retrieved on March 19, 2015 from http://www.opencontent.org/definition/

Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. (2009). Openness, Dynamic Specialization, and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/768/1414

Weller, M. (2014). Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. London, UK: Ubiquity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bam

Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Yuan, L., MacNeill, S., & Kraan, W. (2008). Open educational resources–Opportunities and challenges for higher education. Center for Educational Technology, Interoperability and Standards (CETIS) briefing paper. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/OER_Briefing_Paper_CETIS.pdf

Zawacki-Richter, O., Anderson, T., & Tuncay, N. (2010). The growing impact of open access distance education journals: a bibliometric analysis. The Journal of Distance Education/Revue De L’Éducation à Distance, 24(3). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/661/1210




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.3.206

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.