Assessment challenges in open learning: Way-finding, fork in the road, or end of the line?

Dianne Conrad

Abstract


Growing global commitments to open learning through the use of Open Educational Resources (OERs) are accompanied by concerns over what “to do” with that learning when learners present it to traditional institutions for assessment and accreditation. This paper proposes that established RPL (recognizing prior learning)
protocols, in place at many institutions worldwide, can offer a pedagogically sound framework that supports the spirit of open learning and respects the diversity of learners’ efforts.


Keywords


assessment; higher learning; lifelong learning; OER; open access; portfolios

References


Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Conrad, D. (2011). The Role of Language in Portfolio Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1062/2004

Conrad, D., & McGreal, R. (2012.) Flexible paths to assessment for OER learners: A comparative study. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (JIME), 2(0). Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2012-12

Cormier, D. & Siemens, G. (2010). Through the open door: Open courses as research, learning, and engagement. Educause Review Online, 45(4), 30–39. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/through-open-door-open-courses-research-learning-and-engagement

Council for Adult and Experiential Learning. (CAEL). Ten standards for assessing learning. Retrieved from http://www.cael.org/standards_assessing_learning.htm

Coursera. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. NewYork, NY: Macmillan.

European Foundation for Quality in e-Learning (EFQUEL). (2012). OERtest. Guidelines for OER Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.oer-europe.net/

Fenwick, T. (2006). Reconfiguring RPL and its assumptions: A complexified view. In P. Andersson & J. Harris, (Eds.). Re-theorising the recognition of prior learning (pp. 283–300). Leicester, UK: NIACE.

Gundawardena, L. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance education. In D. Jonassen, (Ed.). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 355–395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Houle, C. (1961). The inquiring mind. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Lewin, T. (2012, May 3). Harvard and M.I.T. Team Up to Offer Free Online Courses. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/03/education/harvard-and-mit-team-upto-offer-free-online-courses.html

Mozilla (n.d.). Open Badges. What are open badges? Retrieved from http://openbadges.org/en-US/

Shale, D. (1987). Innovation in International Higher Education: The Open Universities. Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 7–26.

UNESCO (2011). WSIS Knowledge Commons. Retrieved from http://www.wsis-community.org/pg/

groups/14358/open-educational-resources-oer/

UNESCO (2012). 2012 Paris OER Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/Paris%20OER%20Declaration_01.pdf

Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved from http://www.bloomsburyacademic.com/view/

DigitalScholar_9781849666275/book-ba-9781849666275.xml


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks





Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.