Fostering the Exploitation of Open Educational Resources

Thomas Richter, Patrick Veith

Abstract


The central concept behind Open Educational Resources (OER) is opening up the access to educational resources for stakeholders who are not the usual target user group. This concept must be perceived as innovative because it describes a general economic and social paradigm shift: Education, which formerly was limited to a specific group of learners, now, is promoted as a public good. However, despite very good intentions, internationally agreed quality standards, and the availability of the required technological infrastructure, the critical threshold is not yet met. Due to several reasons, the usefulness of OER is often limited to the originally targeted context. Questions arise if the existing quality standards for Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) actually meet the specific requirements within the OER value chain, if the existing quality standards are applicable to OER in a meaningful way, and under which conditions related standards generally could support the exploitation of OER.

We analyze quality standards for TEL and contrast the life cycle model of commercial learning resources against the life cycle model of OER. We investigate special demands on quality from the context of OER and, taking the former results into account, derive emergent quality criteria for OER. The paper concludes with recommendations for the design of OER and a future standard development.


Keywords


Life Cycle Model; Open Educational Resources; Prosumer Model; Quality; Quality Concept; Technology Enhanced Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adelsberger, H. H. & Pawlowski, J. M. (2001). Standardisierung von Lerntechnologien. Wirt-schaftsinformatik, 43(1), 57-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03250782

Albright, P. (2009). Discussion Highlights: Faculty Members and OER. In S. D’Antoni & C. Savage (Eds.), Open Educational Resources: Conversations in Cyberspace, Paris: UNESCO, pp. 68-69.

Alevizou, P. (2012). Open to interpretation? Productive frameworks for understanding audience engagement with Open Educational Resources. Revista Educação e Cultura Contemporânea, 9(18), 3-19.

Andrade, A.; Caine, A.; Carneiro, R.; Conole, G.; Ehlers, U. D.; Holmberg, C.; Kairamo, A.-K.; Koskinen, T.; Kretschmer, T.; Moe-Pryce, N.; Mundin, P.; Nozes, J.; Reinhardt, R.; Richter, T. & Silva, G. (2010). Beyond OER – Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices: OPAL Report 2011. Due-Publico, Essen, Germany.

Atenas, J.; Havemann, L. & Priego, E. (2014). Opening Teaching Landscapes: The Importance of Quality Assurance in the Delivery of Open Educational Resources. Open Praxis, 6(1), 29-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.81

Atkins, D. E.; Brown, J. S. & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities, Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf

Banks, J. A. (2001). Cultural diversity and education: foundations, curriculum, and teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Benavot, A. (2011). Cross-national Commonalities and Differences in the Intended Curriculum in Primary School Reading and Mathematics. Report of the International Working Group on Assess-ing and Improving Quality Learning, UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from http://cgsg.wiki.educ.msu.edu/file/view/Final+Curriculum+Report+(Feb+2011)+(1).pdf/216448702/Final+Curriculum+Report+(Feb+2011)+(1).pdf

Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.

Cakir, H.; Bichelmeyer, B. & Cagiltay, K. (2002). Effects of cultural differences on e-Mail communi-cation in multicultural environments. In F. Sudweeks; H. Hrachovec & C. Ess. (Eds.), CATaC'02 Proceedings: Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia pp. 29-50.

Cantoni, V.; Cellario, M. & Porta, M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 15(5), 333-345.

COL - Commonwealth of Learning (n.d.). Open Educational Resources (OER). Retrieved from http://www.col.org/resources/crsMaterials/Pages/OCw-OER.aspx

Conole, G. & McAndrew, P. (2009). A new approach to supporting the design and use of OER: Harnessing the power of web 2.0. In M. Ebner & M. Schiefner. (Eds.), Looking toward the future of technology enhanced education: Ubiquitous learning and the digital nature, IGI Global, pp. 123-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-678-0

Creative Commons. (2011). Different types of OER meet different needs. Retrieved from http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Free_to_Learn_Guide/Different_Types_of_OER_Meet_Different_Needs

D’Antoni, S. (2007). Open Educational Resources – The Way Forward: Deliberation of an International Community of Interest. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning. Retrieved from http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/oer-way-forward-final-version.pdf

DCMI Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2012). Dublin Core Metadata Terms. Retrieved from http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/

DePalma, D.; Sargent, B. B. & Beninatto, R. S. (2006). Can’t Read, Won’t Buy: Why Language Matters on Global Websites. An International Survey for Global Consumer Buying Preferences. Retrieved from http://de-de.lionbridge.com/kc/cant-read-wont-buy.htm

Dichev, C. & Dicheva, D. (2012). Open Educational Resources in Computer Science Teaching. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSE 2012, Raleigh, NC, pp. 619-624.

Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ACM eLearn Magazine. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1104968

Dunn, P. & Marinetti, A. (2007). Beyond Localization: Effective Learning Strategies for Cross-Cultural e-Learning. In A. Edmundson. (Ed.), Globalized E-Learning, Cultural Challenges. USA: Idea Group, pp. 255-266.

Friesen, N; Fisher, S. & Roberts, A. (2003). CanCore Guidelines Version 2.0. Athabasca: Athabasca University. Retrieved from http://cancore.athabascau.ca/en/guidelines.html

Fulantelli, G.; Gentile, M.; Taibi, D. & Allegra, M. (2008). The Open Learning Object model to promote Open Educational Resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1). Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/article/2008-9/343

Haberman, M. (1995). Star teachers of children in poverty. West Lafayette: Kappa Delta Pi.

Ho, J. & Ko, L. (2006). The Effect of Students Successful Factors in E-Learning; In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 1996-1999.

Hylén, J. (2009a). Mapping Producers and Users. In S. D’Antoni & C. Savage. (Eds.), Open Educational Resources: Conversations in Cyberspace, Paris: UNESCO, pp. 127-134.

Hylén, J. (2009b). Why individuals and institutions share and use OER. In S. D’Antoni & C. Savage. (Eds.), Open Educational Resources: Conversations in Cyberspace, Paris: UNESCO, pp. 135-142.

IEEE: Learning Technology Standards Committee. (2002). Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata v. 1484.12.1. NY, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Retrieved from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf

IMS LD: IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2003). IMS Learning Design Best Practice and Implementation Guide Version 1.0, Final Specification. Lake Mary, USA: IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_bestv1p0.html

IMS CPIM: IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2004). IMS Content Packaging Information Model: Summary of Changes Version 1.1.4, Final Specification. Lake Mary, USA: IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging/cpv1p1p4/imscp_infov1p1p4.html

IMS LIP: IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2005). IMS Learner Information Package: Summary of Changes Version 1.0.1, Final Specification. Lake Mary, USA: IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/lipinfo01.html

ISO (n. d.). What is a Standard? ISO Homepage. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards.htm

ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36. (2005). ISO/IEC 19796-1:2005 (E), Information Technology - Learning, Edu-cation, and Training - Quality Management, Assurance and Metrics - Part 1: General Approach. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=33934

ISO/IEC JTC1/SC36. (2011). Information technology -- Learning, education and training -- Meta-data for learning resources -- Part 1: Framework; Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=50772

Jesukiewicz, P. (2009). SCORM® 2004, Sharable Content Object Reference Model, 4th Edition Content Aggregation Model (CAM) v1.1. Washington: ADL, Department of Defence. Retrieved from http://www.adlnet.gov/resources/SCORM-2004-4th-Edition-Specification?type=technical_documentation

Kawachi, P. (2013). Quality Assurance Guidelines for Open Educational Resources: TIPS Frame-work. New Delhi: Commonwealth of Learning, CEMCA. Retrieved from http://cemca.org.in/ckfinder/userfiles/files/OERQ_TIPS_978-81-88770-07-6.pdf

Kearsley, G. (1990). Designing educational software for international use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(4), 270-274.

Keyser, B. B. & Broadbear, J. T. (2010). The Paradigm Shift Toward Teaching for Thinking: Perspectives, Barriers, Solutions and Accountability. In: J. M. Black; S. R. Furney; H. M. Graf & A. E. Nolte (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Health Education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 109-118.

Kickbusch, I. S. (2001). Health literacy: addressing the health and education divide. Health Promotion International, 16(3), 289-297.

Kinuthia, W. & Nkonge, B. (2005). Perspectives on Culture and e-Learning Convergence. In G. Richards. (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 2613-2618.

Koppi, T.; Bogle, L & Lavitt, N. (2004). Institutional Use of Learning Objects: Lessons Learned and Future Directions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 449-463.

Kumar, M. S. V. (2009). Open Educational Resources in India’s national development. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 24(1), 77-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680510802627860

Lanham, E. & Zhou, W. (2003). Blended Learning for Cross-Cultural E-Learning. In G. Richards. (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 1927-1930.

Lefevre, D. & Cox, B. (2006). Do cultural schemata impact on students’ engagement with eLearn-ing content? In F. Sudweeks; H. Hrachovec & C. Ess. (Eds.), CATaC'06 Proceedings: Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia, pp. 459-464.

Lôhmus, M.; Lauristin, M. & Salupere, R. (2006). People in the domain of culture: Everyday environment, active participation and preferences. In F. Sudweeks; H. Hrachovec & C. Ess. (Eds.), CATaC'06 Proceedings: Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia, pp. 316-327.

Lubega, J. T. & Williams, S. (2006). A Study of Factors Contributing to the Late Submission of Course Work. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2/2006.

Marcova, M. I. (2004). Barriers for Information Technology Adoption in Post-Soviet Central Asia. In F. Sudweeks & C. Ess. (Eds.), CATaC'04 Proceedings: Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia, pp. 277-281.

Mac Donald, D. & Hedge, N. (2006) Enabling voices, making choices: explorations of gender, power and technologically enabled learning cultures. In F. Sudweeks; H. Hrarchovec & C. Ess. (Eds.), CATaC'06 Proceedings (Tartu, Estonia): Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia, pp. 435-452.

McLaughlin, C. (1999). Culturally responsive technology use: Developing an online community of learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 231-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00112

McLaughlin, C. & Oliver, R. (2000). Instructional Design for Cultural Difference: A case study indigenous online learning in a tertiary context. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 58-72.

Montandon, C. (2004). Standardisierung im e-Learning: Eine empirische Untersuchung an Schweizer Hochschulen. Arbeitsbericht 161, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik der Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Mwanza-Simwami, D.; McAndrew, P. & Madiba, M. (2008). Fostering Open Educational Practices in Cross-Cultural Contexts. In: Proceedings of the IST-Africa 2008 Conference, Windhoek, Namibia. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/11789/

Nilsen, H. (2006). Action research in progress: Student satisfaction, motivation and drop out among bachelor students in IT and information systems program at Agder University College, Nokobit. Nokobit, Norway: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.

Noelting, K.; Leypold, M.; Roeser, M. & Voigt, D. (2004). Learner Centrism and Constructivism - New Paradigms for E-Learning? In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Con-ference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 2434-2441.

Perner, D. (1997). Supporting the classroom teachers in New Brunswick. In OECD (Ed.), OECD Proceedings: Implementing Inclusive Education, Paris, France, pp. 75-80.

Peter, S. & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23

Philip, R.; Lefoe, G.; O'Reilly, M. & Parrish, D. A. (2008). Peer Review Model for the ALTC Ex-change: The Landscape of Shared Learning and Teaching Resources. In Proceedings of the 2008 Ascilite Conference, Melbourne, pp. 766-775.

Pless, N. M. & Maak, T. (2004). Building an Inclusive Diversity Culture: Principles, Processes and Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129-147.

Richter, T. (2011). Adaptability as a Special Demand on Open Educational Resources: The Cultural Context of e-Learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2/2011.

Richter, T. (2012). Culture Matters: Learners’ Expectations Towards Instructor-Support. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Global Learn Asia Pacific 2012 conference, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 130-135.

Richter, T. & Adelsberger, H. H. (2013). The Motivated, The Encouraged, And The Willful Ignorant. In M. F. Paulsen & A. Szücs. (Eds.), Proceedings of the EDEN ‘13 Annual Conference, European Distance and E-Learning Network, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 753-762.

Richter, T. & Ehlers, U. D. (2011). Barriers and Motivators for Using Open Educational Resources in Schools. eLearning Papers, No. 23, 03/2011.

Richter, T. & McPherson, M. (2012). Open Educational Resources: Education for the World? Distance Education, 33(2), 201-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692068

Schellenbach-Zell, J. & Gräsel, C. (2010). Teacher motivation for participating in innovations - supporting factors. Journal for Educational Research Online, 2(2), 34-54. Retrieved from http://www.j-e-r-o.com/index.php/jero/article/view/110

Smith, M. S. & Casserly, C. M. (2006). The Promise of Open Educational Resources. Change: The Magazine for Higher Learning, 38(5), 8-17.

Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face negotiation theory. In Y. Kim & Y. Gudykunst. (Eds.), Theories in Intercultural Communication, Norwood: Ablex, pp. 128-142.

Toffler, A. (1990). Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam.

UNESCO. (2003). Overcoming Exclusion through Inclusive Approaches in Education: A challenge & a vision. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001347/134785e.pdf

van Nederpelt, P. (2013). ISO 9000’s definition of quality. Quality Management, Feb. 2013. Retrieved from http://oqrmmodel.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/iso-9000s-definition-of-quality/

Windle, R. J.; Wharrad, H.; McCormick, D.; Laverty, H. & Taylor, M. (2010). Sharing and reuse in OER: experiences gained from open reusable learning objects in health. JIME, 2010(2), Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/2010/04

Yang, J. F.; Hung, L. F. & Ching-Mei, H. (2004). Challenges for Global Distance Education. In F. Sudweeks & C. Ess. (Eds.), CATaC'04 Proceedings: Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia, pp. 255-259.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.3.139

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.